Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 59 new URLs to the broken link checker ignore list #35898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 20, 2020

Conversation

islemaster
Copy link
Contributor

Adds 59 new URLs to the broken link checker ignore list, as requested by Mariah today.

Comment on lines +90 to +94
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC5FbmsH4fw",
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwLXrN0Yguk",
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKIu9yen5nc",
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYZF6oIZtfc",
"http://youtu.be/hfZrX5YDltU",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible we should ignore all youtube URLs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That thought has crossed my mind. It's certainly possible to have a broken youtube link (videos do get taken down) but the particular link checker tool we're using has a terrible time checking them accurately. I'm not sure why, exactly.

I'll fast-follow with this change.

Copy link
Member

@breville breville left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if some of these older links are no longer used on the site? It would be possible for the script to report that upon each run...

@islemaster islemaster merged commit 1fb717a into staging Jul 20, 2020
@islemaster islemaster deleted the ignore-broken-links branch July 20, 2020 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants