-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show a level as in progress when a student starts interacting with it #36918
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies if this is a dumb question, but why do we report LEVEL_STARTED on every report instead of reporting it once when the level starts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"when the level starts" = on initial page load?
Let me know if this answers your question:
Initially, we wanted to report milestones more often so we can get a more accurate idea of how much time a user is spending on a level (details here if helpful: #36606). This milestone report is intended to allow us to measure the time spent on the level.
However, when triggering this milestone report, we weren't recording any sort of testResult as part of the API call. Even though we now had a record that the user had started the level, that wouldn't translate back to the user as a green outline on their progress bubble.
Reporting the progress as "LEVEL_STARTED" once when the level starts would probably be a better overall design, but the existing convention from other milestone is to record a testResult on every API call, even if that testResult will end up as a noop action.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmkulwik i wonder if renaming the
LEVEL_STARTED
constant would make the more clear? right now it looks like a boolean. maybeINITIAL_TEST_VALUE
orLEVEL_STARTED_VALUE
or something like that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense now, thanks for the explanation. I tried to think of another name but the best I could come up with was "REPORTED_PROGRESS". Not sure if that's better than "LEVEL_STARTED" or not, up to you.