restoring deleted projectbeats code docs files and allowing new filenames to seed

[hannahbergam]

This Pr fixes a seeding bug for programming_expressions. Nine new programming expressions docs were spontaneously deleted. This was not a user error, nor was it an issue with the cyclical nature of our deploy (the rest of the content scoop and deploy to production succeeded without a hitch).

Before, the seed_all function called to look for any new files in these specific folder names: {applab,gamelab,weblab,spritelab}. This meant that new environments were not pulled in (projectbeats being one of them). Now, the programming expression matches the patterns that existed already in programming_class and programming_environment.

Once I updated this and started adding back in the json files, the seeding worked locally! See below:

This list of folders seemed very intentional at the time- see PR here. Requesting review from Dani to see if this specificity is still necessary. A more conservative approach would be to add javalab and projectbeats to this list. However, I imagine we'd then run into the same issue again.

Investigation notes doc and slack threads here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EV_1_X5RP8kQi2A8HT-duiHR6iiCyuE9mQ_GcHOCxeQ/edit
https://codedotorg.slack.com/archives/C0T0PNTM3/p1678478257127849

Links

• spec:
• jira ticket: https://codedotorg.atlassian.net/browse/TEACH-336

Testing story

Deployment strategy

Follow-up work

Privacy

Security

Caching

PR Checklist:

• Tests provide adequate coverage
• Privacy and Security impacts have been assessed
• Code is well-commented
• New features are translatable or updates will not break translations
• Relevant documentation has been added or updated
• User impact is well-understood and desirable
• Pull Request is labeled appropriately
• Follow-up work items (including potential tech debt) are tracked and linked

[dmcavoy]

Thanks for updating this Hannah. I don't see any issue with this from my memory of this space.