Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pandoc 1.10 issues #31

Closed
snoyberg opened this issue Jan 20, 2013 · 11 comments
Closed

pandoc 1.10 issues #31

snoyberg opened this issue Jan 20, 2013 · 11 comments

Comments

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor

BlogLiterately-diagrams-0.1.1 (Brent Yorgey <byorgey@gmail.com>) cannot use:
- pandoc-1.10 -- ==1.9.*

pandoc-1.10 (Brent Yorgey <byorgey@gmail.com>) cannot use:
- test-framework-0.8 -- >=0.3 && <0.7
- test-framework-hunit-0.3.0 -- ==0.2.*
- test-framework-quickcheck2-0.3.0.1 -- >=0.2.9 && <0.3

Pinging @byorgey and @jgm

@jgm
Copy link
Contributor

jgm commented Jan 20, 2013

Fixed in pandoc 1.10.0.1.

+++ Michael Snoyman [Jan 20 13 02:43 ]:

pandoc-1.10 (Brent Yorgey byorgey@gmail.com) cannot use:

  • test-framework-0.8 -- >=0.3 && <0.7

  • test-framework-hunit-0.3.0 -- ==0.2.*

  • test-framework-quickcheck2-0.3.0.1 -- >=0.2.9 && <0.3

    Pinging [1]@byorgey and [2]@jgm


    Reply to this email directly or [3]view it on GitHub.
    [xJAuenYDiIoVt3LF3y6848DAslDCyjnQ6q-QyN4VMN8CeTSZTFSkzUZjtBteUw47.gif]

References

  1. https://github.com/byorgey
  2. https://github.com/jgm
  3. pandoc 1.10 issues #31

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is strange. I see pandoc 1.10.0.1 on Hackage, but when I cabal update it's not available for installation. This happened to me once and I had to reupload the package with a newer version. Seems like a Hackage bug.

@jgm
Copy link
Contributor

jgm commented Jan 20, 2013

Try it again. I just successfully installed it from another machine.

Note: every time I cabal upload something now, I get a 500 Internal
Server Error after a long time, but the package appears on Hackage
and can be cabal installed. I sent you the email before I'd gotten
the 500 error, so maybe it was a bit premature.

+++ Michael Snoyman [Jan 20 13 09:21 ]:

This is strange. I see pandoc 1.10.0.1 on Hackage, but when I cabal
update it's not available for installation. This happened to me once
and I had to reupload the package with a newer version. Seems like a
Hackage bug.

--
Reply to this email directly or [1]view it on GitHub.
[J6T91GIPIyhU-8ti4GCGP7AlC2fiocPKodp06RQqyLxy_4B4AhbjUzETq45r8pZ-.gif]

References

  1. pandoc 1.10 issues #31 (comment)

@jgm
Copy link
Contributor

jgm commented Jan 20, 2013

I'm now uploading 1.10.0.2, since I forgot to put some test
files in extra-source-files...

+++ John MacFarlane [Jan 20 13 09:36 ]:

Try it again. I just successfully installed it from another machine.

Note: every time I cabal upload something now, I get a 500 Internal
Server Error after a long time, but the package appears on Hackage
and can be cabal installed. I sent you the email before I'd gotten
the 500 error, so maybe it was a bit premature.

+++ Michael Snoyman [Jan 20 13 09:21 ]:

This is strange. I see pandoc 1.10.0.1 on Hackage, but when I cabal
update it's not available for installation. This happened to me once
and I had to reupload the package with a newer version. Seems like a
Hackage bug.

--
Reply to this email directly or [1]view it on GitHub.
[J6T91GIPIyhU-8ti4GCGP7AlC2fiocPKodp06RQqyLxy_4B4AhbjUzETq45r8pZ-.gif]

References

  1. pandoc 1.10 issues #31 (comment)

@snoyberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now it's working, thanks.

@jgm
Copy link
Contributor

jgm commented Jan 20, 2013

I discovered mor missing test files. These are fixed in 1.10.0.3,
and now I don't get the 500 error. (Perhaps Hackage runs 'cabal
test' after an upload?)

+++ Michael Snoyman [Jan 20 13 10:04 ]:

Now it's working, thanks.


Reply to this email directly or [1]view it on GitHub.
[J6T91GIPIyhU-8ti4GCGP7AlC2fiocPKodp06RQqyLxy_4B4AhbjUzETq45r8pZ-.gif]

References

  1. pandoc 1.10 issues #31 (comment)

@jwiegley
Copy link
Contributor

I'm still seeing this failure:

Printing build plan to build-plan.log
BlogLiterately-diagrams-0.1.1 (Brent Yorgey <byorgey@gmail.com>) cannot use: 
- pandoc-1.10.0.3 -- ==1.9.*

stackage.hs: Conflicting build plan, exiting
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Finished: FAILURE
 Help us localize this page

@byorgey
Copy link
Contributor

byorgey commented Jan 21, 2013

Yes, I haven't updated BlogLiterately-diagrams yet. I've been away without internet access all weekend. I will update it tomorrow.

@byorgey
Copy link
Contributor

byorgey commented Jan 23, 2013

Sorry, it looks like this isn't as simple as just bumping an upper bound, some changes for compatibility with pandoc-1.10 are actually required. It also looks like the BlogLiterately package itself claims to be compatible with pandoc-1.10... but isn't. (!?) Not sure how that happened. I hope to have things updated and uploaded by Thursday.

@jgm
Copy link
Contributor

jgm commented Jan 23, 2013

Brent, there's a pretty detailed changelog for pandoc 1.10 at
http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/releases.html

+++ Brent Yorgey [Jan 22 13 17:26 ]:

Sorry, it looks like this isn't as simple as just bumping an upper
bound, some changes for compatibility with pandoc-1.10 are actually
required. It also looks like the BlogLiterately package itself claims
to be compatible with pandoc-1.10... but isn't. (!?) Not sure how that
happened. I hope to have things updated and uploaded by Thursday.

--
Reply to this email directly or [1]view it on GitHub.
[xJAuenYDiIoVt3LF3y6848DAslDCyjnQ6q-QyN4VMN8CeTSZTFSkzUZjtBteUw47.gif]

References

  1. pandoc 1.10 issues #31 (comment)

snoyberg added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2013
@byorgey
Copy link
Contributor

byorgey commented Jan 24, 2013

Thanks John, that was indeed helpful. I've now uploaded new versions of both BlogLiterately and BlogLiterately-diagrams which work with the latest pandoc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants