Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft Candidate V3.2 #2

Closed
The-Fiona opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Draft Candidate V3.2 #2

The-Fiona opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@The-Fiona
Copy link

In section 2. Conformance Claim, the following text appears.
"An ST must claim exact conformance to this PP, as defined in the CC and CEM addenda for Exact Conformance"

The term "Exact Conformance" does not appear in CC 3.1R5 or the associated addenda. So this statement is (currently) incorrect. Hint: Some apps define the term within the body of the cPP as a way of navigating this issue.

@dmhale1
Copy link

dmhale1 commented Jul 12, 2019

Exact conformance is defined on page 6 of the addenda.

@lewyble
Copy link
Contributor

lewyble commented Aug 27, 2020

@dmhale1 - I know we talked about this a while ago, but I can't remember. Do I need to make any changes to the PP to address this issue? If no changes are needed please close out the comment. Thanks!

@dmhale1
Copy link

dmhale1 commented Aug 28, 2020

No change neede.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants