-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft Candidate V3.2 #2
Comments
Exact conformance is defined on page 6 of the addenda. |
@dmhale1 - I know we talked about this a while ago, but I can't remember. Do I need to make any changes to the PP to address this issue? If no changes are needed please close out the comment. Thanks! |
No change neede. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In section 2. Conformance Claim, the following text appears.
"An ST must claim exact conformance to this PP, as defined in the CC and CEM addenda for Exact Conformance"
The term "Exact Conformance" does not appear in CC 3.1R5 or the associated addenda. So this statement is (currently) incorrect. Hint: Some apps define the term within the body of the cPP as a way of navigating this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: