fix: duckdb 0.10.1 jemalloc no longer built for non ARM Linux

[Taepper]

Specify library name and version: duckdb/0.10.1

The recipe did not build on ARM Linux.

Here is an analog change in the setup.py provided by duckdb:
duckdb/duckdb@4a89d97

---

• I've read the contributing guidelines.
• I've used a recent Conan client version close to the currently deployed.
• I've tried at least one configuration locally with the conan-center hook activated.

[conan-center-bot]

Conan v1 pipeline ✔️

All green in build 1 (64c892fc0c6e76b406df55ee4a2d06d5d3e3d078):

• duckdb/0.5.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.8.0:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.9.0:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.6.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.8.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.10.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.6.0:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.9.2:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.7.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

---

Conan v2 pipeline ✔️

Note: Conan v2 builds are now mandatory. Please read our discussion about it.

All green in build 1 (64c892fc0c6e76b406df55ee4a2d06d5d3e3d078):

• duckdb/0.9.2:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.6.0:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.5.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.8.0:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.6.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.9.0:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.7.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.8.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

• duckdb/0.10.1:
  All packages built successfully! (All logs)

[RubenRBS]

Hi! Thanks a lot for taking the time to fix this

I also think this warrants some changes to the validate() method of the recipe to notify Conan that this combination is not possible? wdty? Pinging @uilianries too for his opinion too :)

[Taepper]

I also think this warrants some changes to the validate() method of the recipe to notify Conan that this combination is not possible?

Is this question directed at me?

[uilianries]

@RubenRBS I see no direct dependency to jemalloc/5.3.0 package in this recipe 🤔 It would need more investigation to understand, but in the current condition, changing only cpp_info, looks correct to me.

[RubenRBS]

After checking with @uilianries this looks good, we got confused for a second there, sorry about the noise :)

Approving now