Skip cmake.test and meson.test using [conf] profile

[uilianries]

Not only CMake offers test, but Meson also has the same method.

The original issue uses skip_tests (plural), but I think test is better, because is same method name.

Changelog: Feature: Skip build helper test and using [conf].
Docs: conan-io/docs#2154

close #8454

/cc @chausner

• Refer to the issue that supports this Pull Request.
• If the issue has missing info, explain the purpose/use case/pain/need that covers this Pull Request.
• I've read the Contributing guide.
• I've followed the PEP8 style guides for Python code.
• I've opened another PR in the Conan docs repo to the develop branch, documenting this one.

^{Note: By default this PR will skip the slower tests and will use a limited set of python versions. Check here how to increase the testing level by writing some tags in the current PR body text.}

[memsharded]

I think this is interesting, but probably we should further standardize the "run-test" concepts. There is demand for something more built-in and more generic, also to create conditional requirements, etc. So maybe the cmake:skip_test and meson:skip_test are not the best, and we should define something general, in the line of tools.build:skip_tests. Or maybe the default should be to skip tests and tests are only enabled on demand? tools.build:tests?

Lets see what others think.

[uilianries]

tools.build:tests

I like it. More generic and can be re-used for other helpers.

[memsharded]

I like this.

My main question is what is the right default for the future:

• Recipes, including if we want ConanCenter can add building and running tests support.
• By default tests do not build and run (good default for ConanCenter). It is possible to [conf] sometihng like tools.build:tests=True, and tests will build and run
• By default tests build and run (bad default for ConanCenter, probably the tools.build:skip_tests=True should be enforced by CI, and hooks).

Wdyt @lasote?