You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-16)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
ck: ck (0.4.4-1) Debian
Hello,
I am trying to build Debian package ck 0.4.4-1 on MIPS and MIPS64.
While trying to build this package I had problems with ck_epoch_synchronize test.
ck_epoch_synchronize test starts and never ends. It is running on all cores (100%) for hours.
Mips is not listed in include/ck_pr.h so for mips build gcc/ck_pr.h is used.
And when I use same gcc/ck_pr.h as for MIPS(64) package again run test for hours (22+), and does not end, on all cores on Intel i7 CPU.
(./ck_epoch_synchronize expr 8 / 2expr 8 / 2 1)
Help or suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks!
Regards,
Jurica
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the report. ck_epoch_synchronize can indeed take a very very long time to complete if cores are very much contended. However, 22 hours is pretty intense. I'll take a look at potential gcc/ck_pr.h regressions tonight. Note that gcc/ck_pr.h is only meant to serve as a lay-over until a native port is developed (it is meant to be used by porters). Regardless, it shouldn't behave this way.
gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-16)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
ck: ck (0.4.4-1) Debian
Hello,
I am trying to build Debian package ck 0.4.4-1 on MIPS and MIPS64.
While trying to build this package I had problems with ck_epoch_synchronize test.
ck_epoch_synchronize test starts and never ends. It is running on all cores (100%) for hours.
Mips is not listed in include/ck_pr.h so for mips build gcc/ck_pr.h is used.
I have changed define for x86_64 to test this issue on Intel:
And when I use same gcc/ck_pr.h as for MIPS(64) package again run test for hours (22+), and does not end, on all cores on Intel i7 CPU.
(./ck_epoch_synchronize
expr 8 / 2
expr 8 / 2
1)Help or suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks!
Regards,
Jurica
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: