Increases clarity in staging process.

[shloka-gupta]

PR Checklist:

• make all edits to the docs in the src directory, not in docs or in the html files
• note any issues closed by this PR with closing keywords
• put any other relevant information below

This PR hopes to increase clarity for a reader by:

• Adding the steps that are there in the staging process. So that the person hopefully doesn't skip them.
• Adding paths so that it is simplified for the reader.
• Modifying the words a little.

[shloka-gupta]

Hi,
This PR hopes to increase clarity for the reader.

A thing that I have observed is that:

As a reader for 'getting started' I kept jumping from link to link without completely reading all the instructions.

For example: the sentence - Look at the example recipe in the staged-recipes repository`
That's the first instruction I read. I clicked on the link and I thought to myself-- "Okay. Now what?"

And I am assuming there are many readers like me (more experienced ofc!) who fall into a pile of mishaps they could have avoided if only they had read all the instructions.

A possible solution:

Shall we put up the instructions on going around Grayskull, CRAN (Not my forte!), and the example recipe within this document itself?
To neaten things up we could make use of sphinx tabs.

[shloka-gupta]

@kathatherine @beckermr @BastianZim do you think it's a good idea to do so?

[kathatherine]

@chicken-biryani I love sphinx tabs. Anaconda, where I work, is thinking of adding that to our own docs. Please write up an example of what you're thinking and I'd love to look at it. Anything that can increase clarity for the user and keep them from wandering away from the documentation flow is a good idea to me.

[shloka-gupta]

@kathatherine
Fixed it.
(i.e... ) does seem to be a better approach.

Please write up an example of what you're thinking

I'll create a separate draft PR for that? It may get a little messy but I think it's worth a shot.

[kathatherine]

@chicken-biryani Yes, a separate PR would probably be the way to go. Maybe even an entirely separate issue?

[shloka-gupta]

@kathatherine on it!

[kathatherine]

This looks good to me!

[jakirkham]

Powercycling for CI

[shloka-gupta]

Hi,

I am clubbing my ideas for the adding packages into a single PR over here:

#1755

Will wind up the work asap!

[jakirkham]

Ah ok. Was trying to triage and get in PRs that seemed ready to merge