Arch Migrator

[regro-cf-autotick-bot]

This feedstock is being rebuilt as part of the aarch64/ppc64le migration.

Feel free to merge the PR if CI is all green, but please don't close it
without reaching out the the ARM migrators first at @conda-forge/arm-arch.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

_{This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/8555348773, please use this URL for debugging.}

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[qiyunzhu]

Build failed; seemingly due to a conda issue. Not sure what to do. Can anyone help? @conda-forge-admin

[qiyunzhu]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[github-actions]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/scikit-bio-feedstock/actions/runs/8559243062.

[martin-g]

Yes, the build failed on linux-ppc64le at Travis. Some jobs (i.e. Python versions) passed, others - failed.
@qiyunzhu Could you close+reopen the PR to re-trigger the CI checks ?
Another option is to re-run the bot.
If it still fails then probably we can remove ppc64le for the supported CPU architectures...

[martin-g]

@qiyunzhu Unfortunately the ppc64le fails consistently on TravisCI.
I think we have two options:

• drop ppc64le support by removing this line - https://github.com/conda-forge/scikit-bio-feedstock/pull/53/files#diff-478786365dd93f740eb520c2faa03d7a0623273663b75472272c8ef94297bbe2R11
• use cross-compilation at Azure instead (I think the same line needs to be changed to linux_ppc64le: linux_64). See https://github.com/conda-forge/blis-feedstock/pull/29/files#diff-478786365dd93f740eb520c2faa03d7a0623273663b75472272c8ef94297bbe2 for more info

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe:

• In conda-forge.yml: $.provider = {'linux_aarch64': 'default', 'linux_ppc64le': 'linux_64'}.

  {'linux_aarch64': 'default', 'linux_ppc64le': 'linux_64'} is not valid under any of the given schemas

  Schema

  {
    "anyOf": [
      {
        "$ref": "#/$defs/provider"
      },
      {
        "type": "null"
      }
    ]
  }

[qiyunzhu]

@martin-g Thanks for the advice. I am trying the 2nd option: linux_ppc64le: linux_64. There seems to be some linting issue. Let's see if the other tests will pass.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[qiyunzhu]

@martin-g The linux_ppc64le build failed again (for some of the tests). It is unfortunate but let me remove ppc64le support following your 1st suggestion.

[qiyunzhu]

@martin-g Despite that the linux_ppc64le line was removed from conda-forge.yml, the ppc64le tests still started (and some of which failed). I wonder if the ppc64le recipes within the .ci_support should also be manually removed?

[martin-g]

Good point! I think you need to ask the conga-admin-bot to re-render Do you know how to do that? I’m on my mobile now. Sorry for not being able to give you the exact command!

…

On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 20:08, Qiyun Zhu ***@***.***> wrote: @martin-g <https://github.com/martin-g> Despite that the linux_ppc64le line was removed from conda-forge.yml, the ppc64le tests still started (and some of which failed). I wonder if the ppc64le recipes within the .ci_support should also be manually removed? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#53 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABYUQRNTTAIHZ5QAV6QTOTY4LFHHAVCNFSM6AAAAABFXKAEKSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBTGI2TONZSGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[martin-g]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[qiyunzhu]

@martin-g Cool! Looks like all tests have passed. I will merge. Thank you for helping!