Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

podvm: use correct PROTOC_ARCH value for s390x #1738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

genjuro214
Copy link
Contributor

It's related to PR #1734.

After updating PROTOC version to v3.15.0, still failed to build s390x fedora-binaries-builder image with following error:

 => ERROR https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/download/v3.15.0/protoc-3.15.0-linux-s390x_64.zip

https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/download/v3.15.0/protoc-3.15.0-linux-s390x_64.zip is not a valid url.

The valid url is: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/download/v3.15.0/protoc-3.15.0-linux-s390x.zip

So need revise the value of PROTOC_ARCH

PROTOC_ARCH should be "s390x" for version v3.15.0

Signed-off-by: Lei Li <genjuro214@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lei Li <cdlleili@cn.ibm.com>
@genjuro214
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lysliu please help to review

Copy link
Contributor

@lysliu lysliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the download url changed for the protoc, I didn't realize this file need updated
thanks @genjuro214
LGTM

Copy link
Member

@liudalibj liudalibj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@huoqifeng huoqifeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @genjuro214

@huoqifeng huoqifeng merged commit b499f84 into confidential-containers:main Mar 14, 2024
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants