Updated oci-spec-rs to 0.5.1 or later

[guni1192]

ref: #299

Apply builder pattern.

Getter

- let y = linux_xxx.y
+ let y = linux_xxx.y()

Builder

- let x = LinuxXXX { y: y };
+ let x = LinuxXXXBuilder::default().y(y).build().unwrap();

[guni1192]

@utam0k
It seems that if you use a different version of oci-spec-rs, you can't build cargo.
Therefore, can I update youki's oci-spec-rs in this PR?

error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> src/container/builder_impl.rs:161:28
    |
161 |                 resources: linux.resources.clone().unwrap(),
    |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `oci_spec::runtime::linux::LinuxResources`, found struct `LinuxResources`
    |
    = note: perhaps two different versions of crate `oci_spec` are being used?

[utam0k]

@utam0k
It seems that if you use a different version of oci-spec-rs, you can't build cargo.
Therefore, can I update youki's oci-spec-rs in this PR?

error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> src/container/builder_impl.rs:161:28
    |
161 |                 resources: linux.resources.clone().unwrap(),
    |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `oci_spec::runtime::linux::LinuxResources`, found struct `LinuxResources`
    |
    = note: perhaps two different versions of crate `oci_spec` are being used?

Oh... Can I ask you to implement it in this PR?

[guni1192]

@utam0k I see. I'll try it.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #303 (30459f4) into main (4224d56) will decrease coverage by 0.45%.
The diff coverage is 74.39%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #303      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.14%   70.69%   -0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        6828     6702     -126     
==========================================
- Hits         4858     4738     -120     
+ Misses       1970     1964       -6     

[yihuaf]

LGTM.

Just a consideration in the future, we should implement From spec to spec builder, so we don't have boilerplate code to copy a spec. It is error prune since we have to copy every field with a default builder.

[yihuaf]

Same thing.