Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: eslint setup #981

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 8, 2020
Merged

Conversation

armano2
Copy link
Contributor

@armano2 armano2 commented Feb 8, 2020

Basic eslint setup

Description

Motivation and Context

#970 (comment)

Usage examples

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@armano2 armano2 changed the title chore: eslint setup test: eslint setup Feb 8, 2020

// Enable after https://github.com/benmosher/eslint-plugin-import/issues/1650 is fixed
// Forbid the use of extraneous packages
// 'import/no-extraneous-dependencies': [
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if i manage to somehow make this rule work for this repo, it can replace utils package

@marionebl marionebl merged commit 21a91e7 into conventional-changelog:master Feb 8, 2020
@armano2 armano2 deleted the eslint-setup branch February 8, 2020 22:16
@armano2
Copy link
Contributor Author

armano2 commented Feb 8, 2020

@marionebl most likely you are going to want to do some adaptations to this config but for now i enabled most of recommended rules, with few exceptions that was reporting errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants