allow for different spar in tailboom bending and flex models #146
Conversation
|
test models please |
|
test models please |
|
test models please |
|
@bqpd please review. You have 24 hours... haha |
|
oh no I missed it :o time limits are a good plan :D |
| beam["\\bar{\\delta}"][-1]*CLmax <= kappa | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| def makeTailBoom(N=2, tailboomSpar=TubeSpar): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if there's a way to do this with classes instead of factories (the fancy name for functions-that-make-classes)...will take a look
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That would be great if you could find a better way to do this.
| tailLoad = TailBoomBending | ||
|
|
||
| def setup(self, N=N): | ||
| # exec parse_variables(TailBoom.__doc__) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It wouldn't let me run an executive command inside a function...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know it's super sad. That's why another way of doing this that would allow me to keep the exec functionality would be awesome.
| emp, fs, htperf, vtperf, tbperf]) | ||
|
|
||
| from gpkit import settings | ||
| if settings["default_solver"] == "cvxopt": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we've got a collection of cvxopt hacks scattered around the gpkit tests as well; maybe at some point we can abstract them and integrate these observations into error messages / documentation?
| @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ class BoxSpar(Model): | |||
| Sy [m^3] section modulus | |||
| dm [kg] segment spar mass | |||
| w [in] spar width | |||
| d [in] cross secitonal diameter | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/secitonal/sectional/
although secitonal sounds like a sweet word
No description provided.