Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the dependency to Gson #26

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Remove the dependency to Gson #26

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

k24
Copy link

@k24 k24 commented May 9, 2015

Hello,
Thanks for that nice library.
But Gson is not the only one library to handle JSON, and as is well known, using several libraries for the same purpose is not fitting to build apks, so implicitly depending to such a library is not good.

I remove the dependency to Gson by default because of above, though the compatibility is lost. I hope the implicit dependency is removed anyway, so this request is simply to acknowledge that.

Thanks.

@sys1yagi
Copy link

looks good 👀

@gfx
Copy link
Contributor

gfx commented May 29, 2015

I prefer it, even if it breaks backward compatibility.

@rejasupotaro ping?

@rejasupotaro
Copy link
Contributor

@k24 That's a smart solution! I'll update README after merge this PR > @gfx

@gfx
Copy link
Contributor

gfx commented Jun 1, 2015

@k24 I'm sorry but #28 conflicts with this yours. Can you merge master to this PR?

Conflicts:
	demo/src/main/java/com/example/puree/logs/PureeConfigurator.java
	puree/build.gradle
	puree/src/main/java/com/cookpad/puree/Puree.java
	puree/src/main/java/com/cookpad/puree/PureeConfiguration.java
@gfx
Copy link
Contributor

gfx commented Jun 18, 2015

I'm sorry I have rewrite Puree to use Gson heavily in #32. In fact, Gson's JsonObject is more useful than org.json.JSONObject so it makes things better.

@gfx gfx closed this Jun 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants