Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for incorrect limit with remote #52

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2016

Conversation

DanielApt
Copy link

Hey guys, here's a fix for #43. We've continued @mlissner's great work, and fixed the tests.

@mlissner
Copy link
Contributor

Simple enough change. Thanks @DanielApt. Merge it, merge it!

@emaiax
Copy link

emaiax commented Jan 15, 2016

Merge, please :shipit:

@DanielApt
Copy link
Author

@sheeley Could this be merged?

@mlissner
Copy link
Contributor

@jharding, @vskarich, @timtrueman, I've got a project that's waiting on this fix. Without it, the Limit feature is totally broken. Considering this is "corejavascript" I'm pretty concerned to see this PR languish.

Can we get a merge and a release, please? I don't know about other people, but this is a major bug for my organization.

@sheeley
Copy link
Contributor

sheeley commented Jan 18, 2016

@mlissner: I haven't been keeping up with the releases, but AFAIK the other folks (who actually started this fork) have a couple of outstanding issues they want to solve before creating corejs releases of this fork: #9. Tagging folks like @jharding who aren't involved here won't really help, unfortunately, and that won't update the original typeahead package regardless.

@corejavascript/collaborators as I was added after you'd already started this, I don't feel comfortable speaking about the plans/etc. Can you help respond to @mlissner's concerns?

rendered += suggestions.length;

that.async && that.trigger('asyncReceived', query);
that.cancel = $.noop;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

btw fixing these whitespace diffs would be appreciated 👍

@jcrben
Copy link
Contributor

jcrben commented Jan 19, 2016

@mlissner There's nothing stopping you from monkey-patching or even committing in your organization's version. Truth be told, at my organization our typeaheadjs library is fairly hacked up (not by me). Sucks but it's life in the open-source world...

We don't have end-to-end tests running right now, so it would be helpful if people would identify if they have actually tested the code by running it. If we have 3 people who can say they've done that, it would allay concerns.

Another idea is to do a screencast showing the bug and then showing how it operates with the fix.
http://www.screencast.com/

Also thanks to @mlissner for his contribution
@DanielApt
Copy link
Author

@sheeley I've fixed the whitespace diffs.

In the future it might be useful to add an editorconfig file, which should make most code editors use the same whitespace rules.

@mwjackson
Copy link

@jcrben we have been running this PR in production since last week, as well as the test suite in our CI, without any problems

@mlissner
Copy link
Contributor

@jcrben We have released this feature to our beta users and they aren't reporting any issues. It's also on Twitter's typeahead.js issue tracker where several people say it's working properly: twitter/typeahead.js#1435

jcrben added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2016
Fix for incorrect limit with remote
@jcrben jcrben merged commit e241976 into corejavascript:master Feb 7, 2016
@jcrben
Copy link
Contributor

jcrben commented Feb 7, 2016

If some of you want to be committers, let us know so we can ping the owner. I'm juggling too many things right now to spend too much time on it...

@jcrben jcrben mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2016
@mlissner
Copy link
Contributor

mlissner commented Feb 8, 2016

Thanks @jcrben!

@jlbooker
Copy link
Contributor

jlbooker commented Nov 1, 2016

Tracking this for release soon. See #55

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants