Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introspectable shared library #117

Closed
cgwalters opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Introspectable shared library #117

cgwalters opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

At least some components of rpm-ostree should be an introspectable shared library.

  • RPM database inspection and diffs
  • Server side composes

See projectatomic/rpm-ostree-toolbox#70

cgwalters added a commit to cgwalters/rpm-ostree that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2015
This will help build release engineering and other types of tools;
for example, rather than parsing the output of `db diff`, one
should be able to call an API.

Initially, this adds the generic infrastructure for a public shared
library, with a new function call to do the equivalent of `rpm -qa` on
a particular OSTree commit.

Closes: coreos#117
cgwalters added a commit to cgwalters/rpm-ostree that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2015
This will help build release engineering and other types of tools;
for example, rather than parsing the output of `db diff`, one
should be able to call an API.

Initially, this adds the generic infrastructure for a public shared
library, with a new function call to do the equivalent of `rpm -qa` on
a particular OSTree commit.

Closes: coreos#117
cgwalters added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 13, 2015
This will help build release engineering and other types of tools;
for example, rather than parsing the output of `db diff`, one
should be able to call an API.

Initially, this adds the generic infrastructure for a public shared
library, with a new function call to do the equivalent of `rpm -qa` on
a particular OSTree commit.

Closes: #117
Closes: #124
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Further work in #139

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

This was done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant