Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPIC: Liquid staking #13073

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
tac0turtle opened this issue Aug 29, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

EPIC: Liquid staking #13073

tac0turtle opened this issue Aug 29, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

tac0turtle commented Aug 29, 2022

Summary

iqlusion has been working on a liquid staking approach for the cosmos ecosystem. This approach will be used on the cosmos hub and potentially on other chains as well. After much discussion with the hub, iqlusion and others it was deemed that adding this to the cosmos-sdk as an optional configuration for users would benefit the ecosystem.

Work Breakdown

  • Evaluate the work on how to upstream in a manner that gets it merged in a timely manner [12917](WIP: Upstream to evaluate Liquid staking  #12917
  • Create ADR (if needed)
  • Upstream, review and merge into the main branch of the cosmos-sdk
  • QA and test upgrades

cc @zmanian

@zmanian
Copy link
Member

zmanian commented Aug 29, 2022

I will be creating an ADR

@alexanderbez
Copy link
Contributor

if this is just module inclusion and maintenance, can I ask the purpose of the ADR? Or is the ADR just to document the rationale in adding it to the SDK?

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member Author

if this is just module inclusion and maintenance, can I ask the purpose of the ADR? Or is the ADR just to document the rationale in adding it to the SDK?

rationale and design changes to staking

@aaronc
Copy link
Member

aaronc commented Aug 30, 2022

So this would be modifications to x/staking rather than a separate module correct?

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member Author

So this would be modifications to x/staking rather than a separate module correct?

correct, the design makes it so chains can opt into it or not

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member Author

closing in favour of #15543

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants