Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove base app from store #14417

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 27, 2022
Merged

refactor: remove base app from store #14417

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 27, 2022

Conversation

tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

Description

This pr removes base app from the store package. This is un order to decouple store from the sdk. There are a few things we can clean up but the telemetry package may be difficult with how it's done.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@github-prbot github-prbot requested review from a team, facundomedica and julienrbrt and removed request for a team December 26, 2022 13:51
simapp/app.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tac0turtle tac0turtle marked this pull request as ready for review December 26, 2022 13:59
@tac0turtle tac0turtle requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2022 13:59

import (
"reflect"
"unsafe"

Check failure

Code scanning / gosec

Blocklisted import unsafe

Blocklisted import unsafe
package conv

import (
"reflect"

Check failure

Code scanning / gosec

Blocklisted import unsafe

Blocklisted import reflect
Comment on lines +239 to +241
for key, lis := range streamer.Listeners() {
app.cms.AddListeners(key, lis)
}

Check failure

Code scanning / gosec

the value in the range statement should be _ unless copying a map: want: for key := range m

the value in the range statement should be _ unless copying a map: want: for key := range m
// to be used generally, but for a specific pattern to delete keys
// from a map.
func UnsafeBytesToStr(b []byte) string {
return *(*string)(unsafe.Pointer(&b))

Check warning

Code scanning / gosec

Use of unsafe calls should be audited

Use of unsafe calls should be audited
func UnsafeStrToBytes(s string) []byte {
var buf []byte
sHdr := (*reflect.StringHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&s))
bufHdr := (*reflect.SliceHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&buf))

Check warning

Code scanning / gosec

Use of unsafe calls should be audited

Use of unsafe calls should be audited
// must not be altered after this function is called as it will cause a segmentation fault.
func UnsafeStrToBytes(s string) []byte {
var buf []byte
sHdr := (*reflect.StringHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&s))

Check warning

Code scanning / gosec

Use of unsafe calls should be audited

Use of unsafe calls should be audited
Comment on lines +239 to +241
for key, lis := range streamer.Listeners() {
app.cms.AddListeners(key, lis)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
package conv

import (
"reflect"

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Sensitive package import

Certain system packages contain functions which may be a possible source of non-determinism

import (
"reflect"
"unsafe"

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Sensitive package import

Certain system packages contain functions which may be a possible source of non-determinism
baseapp/options.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/app.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
baseapp/options.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
baseapp/options.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 27, 2022

[Cosmos SDK - SimApp] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 27, 2022

[Cosmos SDK] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. label Dec 27, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 1fab762 into main Dec 27, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the marko/store_decouple branch December 27, 2022 23:00
larry0x pushed a commit to larry0x/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
## Description

This pr removes base app from the store package. This is un order to decouple store from the sdk. There are a few things we can clean up but the telemetry package may be difficult with how it's done. 

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. C:Store
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants