feat(x/gov): add min_stake_to_vote parameter

[julienrbrt]

Description

A-11

Cannot be backported to v0.47, but a workaround can be an ante handler.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• run make lint and make test
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[tac0turtle]

i dont think we should add this parameter. if this is related to gov tallying, id say we say wont fix now but will in the near future.

[julienrbrt]

Closed as per above, we may keep the feature later this year if gov gets refactored when adding other features

[julienrbrt]

Re-opening given the x/gov work. I'll fix the conflicts later. Re-opening now to not forget.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[julienrbrt]

Voting will become more expensive if we implement this. Are we going through with it or skip? That was a small dos vector to allow anyone to vote. If yes, I'll finish this.

[alexanderbez]

Voting will become more expensive if we implement this. Are we going through with it or skip? That was a small dos vector to allow anyone to vote. If yes, I'll finish this.

I think this needs more community buy-in and discussion before we proceed with such a change.

[julienrbrt]

We've discussed this in our stand-up and we fix the dos issue in another way, without requiring an extra iteration while voting and tallying.