Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

R4R: Use new tendermint/libs/db.DB.ReverseIterator API #119

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 29, 2018

Conversation

jaekwon
Copy link
Contributor

@jaekwon jaekwon commented Nov 26, 2018

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
package iavl

// Version of iavl.
const Version = "0.11.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a breaking change, so it should be 0.12.0 right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it really? What's breaking in the IAVL here? The GoAPI of the underlying db lib went through breaking change, but doesn't seem like there's a breaking change in this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does IAVL only work with a given db implementation? My understanding was that it took in an interface, so others can in principle have supplied their own db implementation here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great point

@ebuchman ebuchman merged commit 8b561c4 into develop Nov 29, 2018
@ebuchman ebuchman deleted the jae/reverseiterator branch November 29, 2018 17:11
ridenaio pushed a commit to idena-network/iavl that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2019
* Use new tendermint/libs/db.DB.ReverseIterator API

* Bump version

* ...

* update to tendermint v0.27.0-dev1

* breaking change
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants