Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

IBC specification development ordering / tracking issue #26

Closed
6 tasks
cwgoes opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 9 comments
Closed
6 tasks

IBC specification development ordering / tracking issue #26

cwgoes opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 9 comments
Assignees
@sunnya97 @liamsi @mossid @cwgoes
Labels
meta Issues or proposals about the ICS process.

Comments

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Mar 5, 2019 •
edited

Next round - specification clarification & VatTP integration, addressing review comments, 1.0.0.

See this milestone.

Post-MVP

Application-layer (independent)
@cwgoes cwgoes added tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer. meta Issues or proposals about the ICS process. labels Mar 5, 2019
@cwgoes cwgoes removed the tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer. label Mar 6, 2019
@cwgoes cwgoes mentioned this issue Mar 13, 2019
Closed
@jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

This is a great roadmap @cwgoes!

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Mar 19, 2019

I created a milestone for "minimum viable insecure IBC".

@mossid mossid pinned this issue Mar 20, 2019
@ebuchman
Copy link
Member

I think we may want ICS-18 in the first round? It seems like part of the base

@ebuchman
Copy link
Member

Also should we have a separate ICS to define properties of accumulators / merkle proofs?

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Mar 26, 2019

I think we may want ICS-18 in the first round? It seems like part of the base

Agreed, and it's simple - added to the first round.

Also should we have a separate ICS to define properties of accumulators / merkle proofs?

Let's do - #57.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Apr 2, 2019 •
edited

@cwgoes to link to README

edit: Done.

cwgoes added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2019
@cwgoes
Link to issue #26
b0884fa
@cwgoes cwgoes mentioned this issue May 13, 2019
Closed
@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Jun 23, 2019

This needs to be updated w.r.t. #126.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Jun 25, 2019

Updated, see this milestone.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Aug 24, 2019

Closing in favor of milestones, which are now being used instead of this issue.

@cwgoes cwgoes closed this as completed Aug 24, 2019
@cwgoes cwgoes unpinned this issue Aug 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sunnya97 sunnya97

@liamsi liamsi

@mossid mossid

@cwgoes cwgoes

Labels
meta Issues or proposals about the ICS process.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@sunnya97 @ebuchman @liamsi @jackzampolin @mossid @cwgoes