You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When redacting multiple path variables with matching values and different redaction levels, it's possible to end up with incorrect redaction levels applied, because of the way mux provides the list of path variables as a map.
e.g. redacting :4985/foo/foo should redact the db as MD and the docid as UD, but ordering isn't guaranteed by the map iteration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When redacting multiple path variables with matching values and different redaction levels, it's possible to end up with incorrect redaction levels applied, because of the way mux provides the list of path variables as a map.
e.g. redacting :4985/foo/foo should redact the db as MD and the docid as UD, but ordering isn't guaranteed by the map iteration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: