[Sitemaps] Upgrade Valid / Legal / Strict SitemapUrls

[GoogleCodeExporter]

SitemapUrls can be not valid when they are referenced in a sitemap which it's 
directory is on a completely different path than the referenced SitemapUrl.

All as indicated here:
http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.html#location


In order to clarify the validity aspect we need to upgrade the following
1. Add a little more explanations as javadocs and as logs
2. Rename "Legal" (I think only one occurrence) to "valid" (in the parser)
3. Add to the Sitemap class a new method to get all *valid* SitemapUrls
4. When dropping a URL due to invalidity a log should be shown, a URL shouldn't 
be dropped quietly.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by avrah...@gmail.com on 9 Nov 2014 at 2:10

• Blocked on: [Sitemaps] SiteMap should contain a list of SitemapUrls instead of a table of them #57

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by avrah...@gmail.com on 25 Dec 2014 at 11:49

• Now blocked on: [Sitemaps] SiteMap should contain a list of SitemapUrls instead of a table of them #57

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Attaching a patch

Original comment by avrah...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2015 at 11:21

• Changed state: Started
• Added labels: Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

Attachments:

• Issue60.patch

[jnioche]

Ok this one seems to be the only one flagged for 0.6

@Chaiavi could you do a Pull Request for it? Don't forget you can apply the formatting with mvn java-formatter:format see #76; this will make it a lot easier to review it.

[Chaiavi]

ok, will do.

Will take me a couple of days to get to it though...

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Julien Nioche notifications@github.com
wrote:

Ok this one seems to be the only one flagged for 0.6

@Chaiavi https://github.com/Chaiavi could you do a Pull Request for it?
Don't forget you can apply the formatting with mvn java-formatter:format
see #76 #76;
this will make it a lot easier to review it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#60 (comment)
.

[jnioche]

Removed from 0.6 milestone, we can do this later

[Chaiavi]

This one fixes also #90

[lewismc]

Can we do a pull request with this one?

[Chaiavi]

The pull request exists here:
#82

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Lewis John McGibbney <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Can we do a pull request with this one?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#60 (comment)
.