fix(bucket): Convert bools to string in policy #1772
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MisterMX
force-pushed
the
fix/issue-1771
branch
5 times, most recently
from
4d6eac4
to
dac1871
Compare
AWS converts bool values in policy conditions to strings when getting them from the API. Add a new policy parser based on structs that can handle AWS policies correctly, including single items instead of lists. Signed-off-by: Maximilian Blatt (external expert on behalf of DB Netz) <maximilian.blatt-extern@deutschebahn.com>
This was referenced Jun 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
AWS converts bool values in policy conditions to strings when getting them from the API.
This adds a new policy parser based on structs that can handle AWS policies correctly, including single items instead of lists.
Fixes #1771
I have:
make reviewable testto ensure this PR is ready for review.How has this code been tested
Using the example provided in #1771. Added it as a unit test as well.