Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tests broken at timestamp 1900000990 #437

Closed
theoreticalbts opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Tests broken at timestamp 1900000990 #437

theoreticalbts opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@theoreticalbts

Comments

@theoreticalbts
Copy link
Contributor

Breaks on current develop:

GRAPHENE_TESTING_GENESIS_TIMESTAMP=1900000990 tests/chain_test

One failure in asset_claim_fees_test.
@theoreticalbts
Copy link
Contributor Author

At 2000000100 I get failures on stable:

tests/tests/operation_tests2.cpp(1312): error in "zero_second_vbo": check vbid(db).get_allowed_withdraw(db.head_block_time()) == asset(0) failed
tests/tests/operation_tests2.cpp(1314): error in "zero_second_vbo": check vbid(db).get_allowed_withdraw(db.head_block_time()) == asset(10000) failed
tests/tests/fee_tests.cpp(168): fatal error in "asset_claim_fees_test": exception fc::exception is expected

unknown location(0): fatal error in "asset_claim_fees_test": unknown type

theoreticalbts added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2015
@theoreticalbts
Allow zero_second_vbo test to run at any timestamp #437
5b99cd4
theoreticalbts added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2015
@theoreticalbts
Fix GRAPHENE_TESTING_GENESIS_TIMESTAMP behavior of asset_claim_fees_t…
6feadd7 
…est #413 #437
@theoreticalbts theoreticalbts self-assigned this Dec 7, 2015
pmconrad added a commit to pmconrad/graphene that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2017
@pmconrad
Merge pull request cryptonomex#437 from pmconrad/issue_433_429
1b8f9c6 
Fix issues 433 + 429
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@theoreticalbts theoreticalbts

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@theoreticalbts