Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New plots for calibration benchmarking #43

Conversation

HealthyPear
Copy link
Member

In the framework of #31 , it will be useful to compare quantities before the process of image extraction.

The new plots show pedestals and dc_to_phe conversion factor as read by ctapipe.io.event_source from the simtel file used in the comparison.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

You'll be able to see Jupyter notebook diff and discuss changes. Powered by ReviewNB.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #43 into master will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #43   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.43%   0.43%           
======================================
  Files          20      20           
  Lines        2084    2084           
======================================
  Hits            9       9           
  Misses       2075    2075           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c2be3b2...0b0412f. Read the comment docs.

@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@
"\n",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the purpose of this function? Wouldn't it just work to pass max_events to it, and if it's none, it will work fine (no need for the if-statement, I think)


Reply via ReviewNB

@HealthyPear HealthyPear added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 19, 2020
@HealthyPear HealthyPear added this to In progress in Pipeline features and enhancements via automation Feb 19, 2020
@HealthyPear HealthyPear added this to the Release 0.3 milestone Feb 19, 2020
Pipeline features and enhancements automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Mar 31, 2020
@HealthyPear HealthyPear merged commit 0a999f2 into cta-observatory:master Apr 6, 2020
Pipeline features and enhancements automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Apr 6, 2020
@HealthyPear HealthyPear deleted the feature/add_calibration_plots_to_notebook branch April 6, 2020 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants