Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mount existing bucket and access the data already in the bucket #55

Closed
lynnmatrix opened this issue Jul 16, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #60
Closed

Mount existing bucket and access the data already in the bucket #55

lynnmatrix opened this issue Jul 16, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #60

Comments

@lynnmatrix
Copy link
Contributor

One of my use case of csi-s3 is mounting existing bucket and access the data in it, anyone share the same use case with me?

Issue #14 propose a request to mount existing bucket, and PR #42 provided an implementation to meet this request, also the volume created by the solution in PR #42 will mount the root of existing bucket, which means it can access data already existed before the volume created.

@ctrox, your commit "Use volume ID as a prefix if the bucket is fixed in the storage class" will create new path for volume even if the bucket existed, so the volume can not access data already existed in the bucket.

@ctrox, is my use case suit for csi-s3? what's your suggestion?

@minkbear
Copy link

yes, mounting existing bucket and existing folder, that is what I am looking for

@defrox
Copy link
Contributor

defrox commented Dec 7, 2021

@lynnmatrix @minkbear check this #60

@snickell
Copy link

We're using #60 , would definitely be happy to see it merged!

@lynnmatrix
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lynnmatrix @minkbear check this #60

It looks good to me

Christian-TD pushed a commit to defrox/csi-s3 that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2022
@ctrox ctrox closed this as completed in #60 Feb 2, 2022
ctrox added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2022
feat: enable mounting an existing bucket #55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants