Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rubocop #22

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 5, 2017
Merged

Rubocop #22

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 5, 2017

Conversation

bess
Copy link

@bess bess commented Apr 5, 2017

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 5, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.593% when pulling 9b6e4a1 on rubocop into 14e46d4 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.593% when pulling bfc14ce on rubocop into 14e46d4 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.593% when pulling bfc14ce on rubocop into 14e46d4 on master.

@bess
Copy link
Author

bess commented Apr 5, 2017

@mark-dce I added @no-reply's proposed Hydra project style, and cleaned up our code to match. The biggest change was alphabetizing and rationalizing our Gemfile, and I made that a separate commit. In some cases I disabled rules inline (Class has too many lines, and Block has too many lines). I didn't want to disable those rules entirely, because I want them active as we go forward, but for the specific violations already in place it doesn't seem worthwhile to refactor those right now.

@mark-dce mark-dce merged commit f4fb872 into master Apr 5, 2017
@mark-dce mark-dce deleted the rubocop branch April 5, 2017 18:20
@mark-dce
Copy link
Contributor

mark-dce commented Apr 5, 2017

@no-reply can you take a look at this PR (which I've already merged) and see if it fits what what you were thinking it would look like to incorporate rubocop and bixby into our projects?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants