Skip to content

Conversation

@piru
Copy link

@piru piru commented May 16, 2022

Earlier if CURLOPT_LOCALPORT + CURLOPT_LOCALPORTRANGE would go past port 65535 the code would fall back to random port rather than giving up.

Earlier if CURLOPT_LOCALPORT + CURLOPT_LOCALPORTRANGE would go past
port 65535 the code would fall back to random port rather than giving
up.
@bagder
Copy link
Member

bagder commented May 17, 2022

Thanks!

@bagder bagder closed this in 1b3dcae May 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants