CECP engine forfeits on claim of illegal move #411
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As long as cutechess has an arbiter function, illegal moves are not (read: should not be) transmitted to engines. So a claim of an illegal move should not be valid. At present, without adjudication the engine waits and finally forfeits on time.
|
Assuming that Cute Chess is always right. I like it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As long as cutechess has an arbiter function, illegal moves are not (read: should not be) transmitted to engines. So a claim of an illegal move should not be valid. At present, without adjudication the claiming engine waits and finally forfeits on time.
This patch avoids the wait and adjudicates against the CECP engine claiming an illegal move. This resolves #109 .