Fix double notify in equality engine #4036
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4tXJ7f
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #3955.
Previously we were getting two calls to notifyNewEqClass from the equality engine for new application nodes, since the notification was being done in an internal call to newNode(...). The proper place to call this is in addTermInternal(...) which is called only once per Node per SAT context.
This bug potentially impacted some performance (due to redundant calls), and also broke the contract that notifyNewEqClass should only be called once per node per SAT context. In most cases, this was being handled in a benign way by theory solvers, although an assertion was failing in EqualityQuery, which is fixed by this PR.
A block of code changed indentation in this commit.