Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement standard inference #694

Open
mastercyb opened this issue Nov 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

implement standard inference #694

mastercyb opened this issue Nov 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Epic Something amazing and big Priority: High

Comments

@mastercyb
Copy link
Member

mastercyb commented Nov 5, 2023

We discussed for a while one property of the ranking mechanism which rise huge concerns into the answering capabilities of cyber: lets call it true-false problem

true-false problem

  • let us imagine that true particle have cyberank 10, and false particle have cyberank 9
  • the environment allow to link any particle with any
  • that means that for any questions which cyberlinked to true and false the winning answer will always be true
  • of course such behavior does not feels like something superintelligent
  • we always emphasize that cyberank is a core ranking factor, but not the only one which is possible on top the cyber architecture
  • in order to solve true-false problem we have to compute weights of links in a context

in this post i introduce an algo i will call standard inference

  • does not introduce additional complexity
  • requires zero additional information
  • follow occam razor principle, that is it is as dumb and simple as possible

standard inference

  • get all particles cyberlinked with asking particle sorted by rank
  • for each particle get all cyberlinks
    • for each cyberlink get address
      • for each address
        • get [[V]] balance
        • get number of cyberlinks
        • compute average [[V]] per cyberlink
    • sum (average V) votes for every particle
  • multiplay rank of each particle by sum (average V)

cyber project without consensus around standard inference on top of cybergraph which solves true false problem seems very blurry to me

@mastercyb mastercyb added the Epic Something amazing and big label Nov 5, 2023
@mastercyb mastercyb transferred this issue from cybercongress/cyb-ts Nov 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Epic Something amazing and big Priority: High
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants