Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prototype annotations for Cycic #105

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Prototype annotations for Cycic #105

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gonuke
Copy link
Member

@gonuke gonuke commented Apr 19, 2013

This pull request is issues for the purpose of sharing a prototype of an annotation scheme. This has not been tested but should be a close approximation to valid RelaxNG Schema definition.

@@ -9,8 +9,17 @@ datatypeLibrary="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes">
<element name="capacity">
<data type="double"/>
</element>
<element name="inventorysize">
<data type="double"/>
<element name="Inventory Size">
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of declaring a display name to use in Cycic, why not just start naming all elements with display names? (We don't automatically generate data structures so we don't need to worry about valid naming of variables.)

@gidden
Copy link
Member

gidden commented Apr 19, 2013

Looks good, is this still a work in progress?

@gonuke
Copy link
Member Author

gonuke commented Apr 19, 2013

Yes - definitely a work in progress - I wanted to use a real code sample for psuedo-coding this rather than embedding it in an issue.

@gidden
Copy link
Member

gidden commented Apr 22, 2013

Sorry, @gonuke - could I get a clarification as to when this should be pulled / an issue describing when it's complete?

@gonuke
Copy link
Member Author

gonuke commented Apr 22, 2013

Closing this with a new Cycic issue: cyclus/cycic#23

@gonuke gonuke closed this Apr 22, 2013
@scopatz scopatz deleted the sample-annotate branch May 30, 2014 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants