Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate ResourceBuff #604

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2024
Merged

Deprecate ResourceBuff #604

merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

bennibbelink
Copy link
Contributor

A small change to allow for the removal of the ResourceBuff class in cyclus

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 17, 2024

Build Status Report - 72ccbab - 2024-05-17 12:12:27 -0500

Build FROM cyclus_20.04_apt/cyclus:latest
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_20.04_apt/cyclus:stable
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_20.04_conda/cyclus:latest
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_20.04_conda/cyclus:stable
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_22.04_apt/cyclus:latest
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_22.04_apt/cyclus:stable
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_22.04_conda/cyclus:latest
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success
Build FROM cyclus_22.04_conda/cyclus:stable
  • Cycamore: Success
  • Cymetric: Success

@bennibbelink bennibbelink requested a review from gonuke May 17, 2024 03:08
Copy link
Member

@gonuke gonuke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @bennibbelink

@@ -318,7 +318,6 @@ void Storage::ProcessMat_(double cap) {
using cyclus::Material;
using cyclus::ResCast;
using cyclus::toolkit::ResBuf;
using cyclus::toolkit::Manifest;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While we're here... I don't see any reason for any of these using statements to be here...?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great point. I went through storage.cc and cleaned up some other using statements. A quick search of the cycamore archetypes shows there are a lot of using statements throughout the repo. I will make an issue to go through and clean up where it is necessary

CHANGELOG.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@gonuke gonuke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @bennibbelink

@gonuke gonuke merged commit a444242 into cyclus:main May 18, 2024
10 checks passed
@bennibbelink bennibbelink deleted the resource-buff branch May 18, 2024 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants