Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove historic CRAM-MD5 mechanism #355

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Sep 7, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Remove historic CRAM-MD5 mechanism #355

Neustradamus opened this issue Sep 7, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@Danelif
Labels
research learn more about a topic Security security related

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Sep 7, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Dear @cypht-org team,

Can you remove CRAM-MD5 from the code?

It is unsecure:

Thanks in advance.
@jasonmunro jasonmunro self-assigned this Nov 12, 2019
@jasonmunro jasonmunro added the research learn more about a topic label Nov 12, 2019
@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the report, I I will look into it. Related: #354

@Neustradamus Neustradamus changed the title RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic Remove historic CRAM-MD5 mechanism Aug 13, 2023
@marclaporte marclaporte assigned Danelif and unassigned jasonmunro May 7, 2024
@marclaporte marclaporte added the Security security related label May 7, 2024
@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

@Danelif please advise

@Danelif Danelif mentioned this issue Jun 4, 2024
Merged
@Danelif
Copy link
Member

Danelif commented Jun 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@Neustradamus @marclaporte
PR :
#1063
PS: i merged This PR by mistake so i reverted it.

@marclaporte marclaporte mentioned this issue Jun 5, 2024
Open
@Danelif Danelif mentioned this issue Jun 7, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Danelif Danelif

Labels
research learn more about a topic Security security related
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@Neustradamus @marclaporte @jasonmunro @Danelif