Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Solve unsafe to chain command does not exist #126

Merged

Conversation

Erik-Outreach
Copy link
Contributor

@Erik-Outreach Erik-Outreach commented Mar 28, 2023

This is kinda urgent because if you sync the latest package you get error saying the rule doesn't exist, for not being registered properly:

Definition for rule 'cypress/unsafe-to-chain-command' was not found

@Erik-Outreach
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BlueWinds @chrisbreiding could any of you please merge this? It's to fix an error in latest release

@Erik-Outreach
Copy link
Contributor Author

Solves: #125 (comment)

@chrisbreiding chrisbreiding merged commit 1fdfef7 into cypress-io:master Mar 28, 2023
1 check passed
@nagash77
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.13.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

bmish added a commit to bmish/eslint-plugin-cypress that referenced this pull request May 21, 2023
* master:
  Apply suggestions from code review
  Update package.json
  explain import bindings case in code comment
  Update triage_closed_issue_comment.yml
  fix: Wait incorrectly reported as unsafe to chain
  fix: Solve unsafe to chain command does not exist (cypress-io#126)
  chore: heading of no-unnecessary-waiting.md (cypress-io#124)
  Create triage_closed_issue_comment.yml
  Create add-issue-triage-board.yml
  chore: 'unsafe-to-chain-command' added as recommended rule
  feat: Add 'unsafe-to-chain-command' rule
  support import bindings in no-unnecessary-waiting rule
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants