Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [CYCLOUD-1447] Auto-detect PR numbers #1009

Merged
merged 44 commits into from Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

ax-vasquez
Copy link
Contributor

@ax-vasquez ax-vasquez commented Aug 28, 2023

The Cypress GitHub action does not currently expose PR information in a way that is immediately-usable by the app (without further processing).

This PR updates the GitHub action so that it detects the PR number and passes it along in a way that can be consumed by the app. Currently we are targeting the existing environment variables, CYPRESS_PULL_REQUEST_ID & CYPRESS_PULL_REQUEST_URL since both of these already exist and are currently in-use by both the app and cloud.

NOTE: If the user has already set these variables, we will not overwrite them.

PR Number detection logic

  1. When the GitHub event provides us with the PR info, we simply pass it along
  2. If the event doesn't have PR info, we instead grab the first PR related to the commit using GitHub's listPullRequestsAssociatedWithCommit API

Testing

For each of these test scenarios, start with the following steps:

  1. Set up a project with the Cypress GitHub action
  2. Customize your action so that it echos the CYPRESS_PULL_REQUEST_ID & CYPRESS_PULL_REQUEST_URL values

With PR

  1. Open a PR > push a commit and trigger the action
  2. Check the action output and ensure the echo-ed values match that of the PR from which the action was triggered

With no direct PR, but with related PRs

  1. Create a new branch from a branch that has a PR already
  2. Push the branch up to GitHub, but do not create a PR for the new branch
  3. Push the branch, but don't create a new commit (this new commit won't exist in the base PR if you do) > this should trigger a run
  4. Check the action output and ensure the echo-ed values match that of the PR from the base branch

With no PRs at all

  1. Close all open PRs
  2. Create a new branch
  3. Push a commit to trigger a new run
  4. Check the action output and ensure the echo-ed values are empty

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 28, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Collaborator

@ax-vasquez

Will you add a detailed description of what this PR is intended to achieve and how you will test it?

You should read the CONTRIBUTING.md and apply the guidance in it.

Note that this repo is based on npm not Yarn, so you shouldn't have a yarn.lock in your PR. The repo uses package-lock.json.

@ax-vasquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ax-vasquez

Will you add a detailed description of what this PR is intended to achieve and how you will test it?

You should read the CONTRIBUTING.md and apply the guidance in it.

Note that this repo is based on npm not Yarn, so you shouldn't have a yarn.lock in your PR. The repo uses package-lock.json.

Yes, I will be sure to do that once this I have this in a state that's ready for review.

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Collaborator

@ax-vasquez

Thanks very much for the description! Probably a shorter version of that should go into the README at some stage.

You need to either enable HUSKY hooks or run

npm ci
npm run format
npm run build

to make sure that the code that you've written is actually the code which gets executed.

I'll hold back on making any more comments unless you ask for review, since this is still a Draft PR.

@ax-vasquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MikeMcC399 no problem! I was still working out some of the details when I had been pulled to something else; apologies for the delay there.

Once we're certain this is working as we intend, the last part of this task is to update the docs with the changes, so I will be sure to update relevant docs before merging this one 👍

Appreciate the feedback here!

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @tbiethman 👋🏻

I have a release-related question for you. I see we have major versions v5 and v6 for the action, with v5 our current recommended version. Which major version would these changes be released under using the semantic release bot? Releasing under both would be ideal.

We're in a transition phase right now because GitHub hasn't properly documented that node20 is supported. That's why I hadn't changed the recommended version to v6 yet.

We can't use v5 to add any new features because this is now frozen. The sematic release workflow is not set up to maintain different versions at the same time and that would require quite some effort to implement without any real benefit.

I will accelerate moving to v6 as the recommended version. I already have that prepared, so it is just a question of submitting it as a PR. You can then ignore v5 and we'll just refer to v6 going forward. Stand by 🙂 !

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Collaborator

@tbiethman

Co-authored-by: Mike McCready <66998419+MikeMcC399@users.noreply.github.com>
@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Collaborator

@tbiethman

The Cypress Cloud template for GitHub actions should also be updated in conjunction with this PR. Will you handle that process? If not, I would open a separate issue for that:

Open https://cloud.cypress.io/
Click "New project"
Enter a project name, click "Create project"
Under section 3 "Finish CI setup", click GitHub Actions

@tbiethman
Copy link

@MikeMcC399 good call, I'll work on getting those updated cloud-side.

index.js Outdated
// should have format refs/pull/<pr_number>/merge when triggered by pull_request workflow
prNumber = parseInt(GITHUB_REF.split('/')[2])
} else {
const resp = await client.request(
Copy link

@tbiethman tbiethman Aug 31, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might also be worth adding a try/catch around this request in the event of a partial outage or something. I don't think we'd want to halt a recording by throwing in that case.

README.md Outdated
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
```

#### Branch with PR

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than focusing these sections around branches/PRs, it might make more sense to specify the behavior based on the various workflow event types.

For example, if the action executes on a push event, we'll still need to make the request, even if there is a PR open, as the GITHUB_HEAD_REF env will not be set for that event.

We could do something like:

<example yaml here>

The behavior of the action varies based on the triggering event type.

#### Triggering event: `pull_request`/`pull_request_target`

...

#### Triggering event: `push`

...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call! I'll update this 👍 That's much clearer.

Copy link

@tbiethman tbiethman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a few last minute comments. My testing has shown this all to be working great!

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Collaborator

@tbiethman

@v6 is now the recommended version, so you can disregard @v5 now

Copy link

@tbiethman tbiethman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ran through my tests on the latest commit and all works as expected!

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ax-vasquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MikeMcC399 we've had one approval so far - just wanted to get the thumbs up from you as well before we merge. Let me know if this is good with you! 😃

Co-authored-by: Mike McCready <66998419+MikeMcC399@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small documentation suggestion, otherwise LGTM! 👍🏻

@ax-vasquez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome, thanks! I committed the change - will merge this on green 👍

@ax-vasquez ax-vasquez merged commit 7215fc1 into master Sep 1, 2023
69 checks passed
@ax-vasquez ax-vasquez deleted the armando/fix/CYCLOUD-1447 branch September 1, 2023 17:27
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2023

🎉 This PR is included in version 6.4.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants