Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inquirer@1.1.3 untested ⚠️ #34

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

inquirer just published its new version 1.1.3.

State No tests ⚠️
Dependency inquirer
New version 1.1.3
Type dependency

This version is covered by your current version range, but I could not detect automated tests for this project. Without a test suite I can not really tell whether your project still works.

I was looking at the latest commit of your default branch, but GitHub said there is no status attached to it.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

  • Fix bug where options passed to Inquirer were mutated.

The new version differs by 4 commits .

  • 5084874 1.1.3
  • e6f4965 ensure provided options aren't overwritten on successive prompt calls (#415)
  • 5c4d0c0 Update README.md (#404)
  • 6c5c562 added table of contents to readme (#402)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@helloyou2012 helloyou2012 merged commit 0983b51 into master Sep 2, 2016
@helloyou2012 helloyou2012 deleted the greenkeeper-inquirer-1.1.3 branch September 2, 2016 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants