Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ImageGlass too slow especially for raw file. maybe use embedded jpeg ? #1290

Closed
Zeus64 opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

ImageGlass too slow especially for raw file. maybe use embedded jpeg ? #1290

Zeus64 opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Zeus64
Copy link

Zeus64 commented Feb 18, 2022

ImageGlass is very slow to open, especially for raw file, but often raw files contain embedded jpeg with high resolution (exemple my raw contain a preview jpg of 1616x1080 that is often bigger than the screen resolution) so is could be good for imageGlass to use this embedded jpeg instead.

@d2phap
Copy link
Owner

d2phap commented Feb 20, 2022

You can select this option in Settings > Image:

image

@Zeus64
Copy link
Author

Zeus64 commented Feb 20, 2022

Oh my god didn't catch it ! it's sooo good!

Is it possible to enable it also (the embedded thumbnail) for jpeg ? I explain, my camera is doing 7952x5304 images, that are quite big and it's little slow to open it with imageglass (2-3 seconds each images), but they have a thumbnail of 1616x1080 that is quite big and enough for my screen resolution. If we use the embded thumbnail then we can accelerate drastically by a factor from 5 to 10 the opening speed (if I compare with the arw who use it)

the option I imagine:

  • Use embedded thumbnail for all images : yes/no

and because sometime jpeg images can have very small thumbnail that we can't use :

  • to use embedded thumbnaill, thumbnail must be :
    • with a min width of: xxx
    • with a min height of: xxx

@Zeus64
Copy link
Author

Zeus64 commented Feb 22, 2022

I just opened a new feature request :
#1293

@d2phap
Copy link
Owner

d2phap commented Feb 22, 2022

Thanks I will take a look

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants