Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#2275. Add noSuchMethod tests. Part 3 #2294

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

@sgrekhov sgrekhov commented Oct 2, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good! Just one addition would be useful: As far as I can see, we don't catch the case where a getter or setter is noSuchMethod forwarded, but no forwarder has been generated (and noSuchMethod is just invoked directly). I believe we would be able to detect that there is a noSuchMethod forwarder by using wrong types and seeing that there is a dynamic type check (so we do get a exception).

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sgrekhov sgrekhov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated. Please take another look

Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the code again, I'm afraid the setter-causes-dynamic-error-so-we-do-have-a-forwarder test must put dynamic in a different location, such that we don't get a successful test run for the wrong reasons.

@sgrekhov sgrekhov requested a review from eernstg October 11, 2023 07:46
@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Makes sense! Updated

Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@eernstg eernstg merged commit 1de898c into dart-lang:master Oct 11, 2023
2 checks passed
copybara-service bot pushed a commit to dart-lang/sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2023
2023-10-13 sgrekhov22@gmail.com Fixes dart-lang/co19#2310. Fix new roll failures (dart-lang/co19#2311)
2023-10-13 sgrekhov22@gmail.com Fixes dart-lang/co19#2306. Fix promoted instance type in not_promotable_A01_t04.dart (dart-lang/co19#2309)
2023-10-13 sgrekhov22@gmail.com Fixes dart-lang/co19#2307. Don't expect private fields promotion on static fields (dart-lang/co19#2308)
2023-10-11 sgrekhov22@gmail.com dart-lang/co19#2291. Update `Link.create()` tests according to the documentation (dart-lang/co19#2299)
2023-10-11 sgrekhov22@gmail.com dart-lang/co19#2275. Add `noSuchMethod` tests. Part 3 (dart-lang/co19#2294)
2023-10-10 sgrekhov22@gmail.com dart-lang/co19#2275. Add `noSuchMethod` tests. Part 4 (dynamic semantics) (dart-lang/co19#2296)
2023-10-10 sgrekhov22@gmail.com dart-lang/co19#2291. Update `Link.create()` according to the documentation. Part 2 (dart-lang/co19#2301)
2023-10-10 sgrekhov22@gmail.com Fixes dart-lang/co19#2268. Fix LibTest/io/WebSocket/closeCode_A01_t02.dart to be not racy (dart-lang/co19#2302)
2023-10-09 sgrekhov22@gmail.com dart-lang/co19#1400. Add more tests for private fields promotion of extension types (dart-lang/co19#2300)

Change-Id: Ib34f392c8a2a0aaab8b7b0cb028f918ab2a3249f
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/330460
Commit-Queue: Alexander Thomas <athom@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Thomas <athom@google.com>
@sgrekhov sgrekhov deleted the co19-2275-3 branch November 14, 2023 11:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants