Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust UP for null safety, cf. language issue #1193 #1195

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2020

Conversation

eernstg
Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg commented Sep 2, 2020

As mentioned in #1193, the rules for UP involving type variables need to be adjusted for soundness. This PR makes an adjustment to achieve this (as a special case of instantiation to bound plus a check).

It also adjusts the rules for UP(T Function<...>(...), T2) and UP(T1, T Function<...>(...)), where the current rule rule may incorrectly discard nullability.

@eernstg
Copy link
Member Author

eernstg commented Sep 16, 2020

@leafpetersen, do you have further comments on this?

Copy link
Member

@leafpetersen leafpetersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@eernstg eernstg merged commit 96b0abf into master Sep 18, 2020
@eernstg eernstg deleted the spec_updown_fix_sep20 branch September 18, 2020 08:45
dart-bot pushed a commit to dart-lang/sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2020
dart-lang/language#1195 changes the UP function
such that it uses the greatest closure with bounded and promoted type
variables, and adjusts the catch-all rules about function types (used
with `Function(int)` and `String` and other "otherwise" cases).

This PR adds tests for the updated rules.

Change-Id: I793b85ceec76105d013c03e8d9bccdd187bb476f
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/166101
Commit-Queue: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Leaf Petersen <leafp@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants