-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DSP-740 Update List Name #1727
Merged
Merged
DSP-740 Update List Name #1727
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0957d62
feature (updateListName) listName can be changed
SepidehAlassi 687a015
fix (updateListName) add check for uniqueness of the names and fix th…
SepidehAlassi 014fb89
refactor (updateListName) remove the redundant route
SepidehAlassi 519b361
feature (updateList) make comments and labels in payload of update re…
SepidehAlassi b9fb92a
refactor (updateList) clear error message for empty labels or comment…
SepidehAlassi d65116a
Merge branch 'develop' into wip/DSP-740-UpdateListName
SepidehAlassi 498bada
feature (updateListName) add test data for updating list name
SepidehAlassi 675004b
refactor (updateListName) checks for empty optional labels and comments
SepidehAlassi a4db9d6
docs (updateListName) fix generate test data documentation
SepidehAlassi cba78e2
feature (updateListName) update `expected-client-test-data.txt`
SepidehAlassi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly, the reason for the
Option
is that if you submit an empty list, it should remove all labels. Is that right? If so, could you add a test for that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, if you submit
labels=[]
it will return aBedRequestException
. At the time being, the idea is that the update route should not be used to delete the properties. This will change later.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So why use
Option
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
because without it, the user needs to repeat the labels and comments in the payload even if she wants to only change the
name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So when
labels
andcomments
are optional, user can simply use the following request body to update only thename
of the list without having to give/repeat the values oflabels
andcomments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I understand, thanks.