Annotation machinery

[jakirkham]

We've had a fair number of questions related to things changed after adding the annotation machinery. Most of the answers are pretty similar. Also this often ties into other things people may want to do (heterogenous computing, special resource allocation, etc.). It might be helpful to create some higher visibility content on this explaining what changed, how users should update existing code, and what new things they might now be able to do with annotations

[jakirkham]

cc @sjperkins (whose probably best positioned to articulate this well 😉)

[mrocklin]

I think that this would be great to see

…

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:54 PM jakirkham ***@***.***> wrote: cc @sjperkins <https://github.com/sjperkins> (whose probably best positioned to articulate this well 😉) — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#79 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACKZTELIBQBSFTL6NXAUQTTBQZM3ANCNFSM4YNVSYOQ> .

[sjperkins]

Thanks for the reminder @jakirkham. Our annotation experimentation is showing good results: I'll discuss this further in the Thursday meeting. /cc @JSKenyon

I've also booked off March for writing in general, so the timing is good for me to take this on.

Related: dask/dask#6928