Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue #154 #155

merged 2 commits into from Sep 22, 2018


Copy link

This fixed the type error for me in python 2.7. I'll work on and submit the CI fixes in a seperate PR.

Copy link

@guillaumeeb guillaumeeb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I'm probably being too meticulous, but I would prefer to have the int() call around math.ceil(). Does this makes sens to you?

Copy link
Contributor Author

kaelancotter commented Sep 22, 2018

Moved. Your code base your call. LMK if/how you'd prefer this orchestrated if a single commit is significantly preferred.

@guillaumeeb guillaumeeb merged commit 3aa3977 into dask:master Sep 22, 2018
Copy link

We're squashing commits upon merge, so it's fine. I haven't checked #157 Travis output, but if It correctly catched the bug fixed here, It would ne good to retrigger the Travis check with an empty commit for example.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants