We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I originally used refgenie_server as the name of this repository, and then used refgenies as the command to invoke to start the server.
refgenie_server
refgenies
I'm not sure if refgenies is good because it is just so close to refgenie that it may cause some confusion.
I wanted to see what you thought about this and if you had any other suggestion for CLI name.
some ideas:
refgenserve
rgserver
rgcserver
refgenieserver
I'm leaning toward rgserver for the command name....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like refgenieserver the most
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ditto to @MichalStolarczyk
the command would then be refgenieserver serve and refgenieserver archive. that's good?
refgenieserver serve
refgenieserver archive
LMK if I can proceed with the repo/command name change
it's not my favorite but since you both vote for it, I'm on board. Go for it!
the repo should also change names to that then
rename project, see #9
bcd2f90
nmagee
vreuter
stolarczyk
No branches or pull requests
I originally used
refgenie_server
as the name of this repository, and then usedrefgenies
as the command to invoke to start the server.I'm not sure if
refgenies
is good because it is just so close to refgenie that it may cause some confusion.I wanted to see what you thought about this and if you had any other suggestion for CLI name.
some ideas:
refgenserve
rgserver
rgcserver
refgenieserver
I'm leaning toward
rgserver
for the command name....The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: