issue-2460: use non-block reading in async methods of fuse tbl

[dantengsky]

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://databend.rs/policies/cla/

Summary

fix issue

• Fuse Engine hang in the second insert query #2460

async methods of fuse table should use async readers if possible

Changelog

• Bug Fix
• Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

Related Issues

Fixes #2460

Test Plan

Unit Tests

Stateless Tests

[databend-bot]

Thanks for the contribution!
I have applied any labels matching special text in your PR Changelog.

Please review the labels and make any necessary changes.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2485 (edc2780) into main (f09aa2f) will increase coverage by 0%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #2485   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     72%     72%           
=====================================
  Files        643     643           
  Lines      36541   36552   +11     
=====================================
+ Hits       26362   26372   +10     
- Misses     10179   10180    +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
query/src/datasources/table/fuse/table.rs	90% <100%> (+<1%)	⬆️
...uery/src/datasources/table/fuse/table_do_append.rs	91% <100%> (+8%)	⬆️
...datasources/table/fuse/table_do_read_partitions.rs	92% <100%> (+<1%)	⬆️
...ry/src/datasources/table/fuse/table_do_truncate.rs	86% <100%> (ø)
query/src/common/mod.rs	69% <0%> (-21%)	⬇️
metasrv/src/meta_service/meta_service_impl.rs	70% <0%> (-2%)	⬇️
common/clickhouse-srv/src/types/block/mod.rs	96% <0%> (+<1%)	⬆️
query/src/datasources/table/fuse/index/min_max.rs	92% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️
common/datavalues/src/data_value_ops.rs	44% <0%> (+4%)	⬆️
common/streams/src/stream_progress.rs	95% <0%> (+4%)	⬆️
... and 4 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f09aa2f...edc2780. Read the comment docs.

[sundy-li]

LGTM, but the reasons for why still need deep investigation.

[databend-bot]

CI Passed
Reviewer Approved
Let's Merge

[dantengsky]

LGTM, but the reasons for why still need deep investigation.

yeah, I am digging into it. touch you later

[drmingdrmer]

/lgtm

With a unit test it's getting better.

[databend-bot]

Approved! Thank you for the PR @dantengsky