Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better ctrl+click implementation #16219

Open
plotn opened this issue Apr 18, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #18754
Open

Better ctrl+click implementation #16219

plotn opened this issue Apr 18, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #18754

Comments

@plotn
Copy link
Contributor

plotn commented Apr 18, 2022

Hi!
When we click control + object name in sql editor we appear in the object editor and this is ok.
But when object was not loaded into memory, we got an error:
dbeaver_cannot_find
It is ok, because we created table via script and DBEaver dont know about it until object tree reloading.
Could it be possible (in such cases) to run background script to data dictionary, find such objects, add them to the tree (in certain spots) and show object editor like it was loaded into memory "in common way"?
I think UI convenience will be much better.

@LonwoLonwo
Copy link
Member

Ok. Maybe we can refresh metadata during the search process (maybe with the extra option in the Preferences).
Thanks for the report @plotn

@LonwoLonwo LonwoLonwo added this to the 22.1.4 milestone Apr 18, 2022
@n5a5 n5a5 added the AS label Apr 18, 2022
@emironovDB emironovDB modified the milestones: 22.1.4, 22.3.3 Jul 19, 2022
@E1izabeth E1izabeth self-assigned this Jan 9, 2023
@E1izabeth E1izabeth added the sp:3 label Jan 9, 2023
E1izabeth added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2023
@Matvey16 Matvey16 self-assigned this Jan 16, 2023
E1izabeth added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2023
@arhayka arhayka modified the milestones: 22.3.3, 22.3.4 Jan 20, 2023
@E1izabeth E1izabeth removed this from the 22.3.4 milestone Jan 23, 2023
@E1izabeth
Copy link
Member

The main part of the feature were implemented in the linked PR, however we can't accept this changes due to the found bug #18843. After successful bug resolution this feature request could be handled again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants