Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide support for multiple $PORT values per process #268

Closed
padcom opened this issue Sep 26, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Provide support for multiple $PORT values per process #268

padcom opened this issue Sep 26, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@padcom
Copy link

padcom commented Sep 26, 2012

Use-case:

Starting services with separate administration interface, for example ActiveMQ or MongoDB

Current state:

There's no way to start applications that require more than one port to function properly.

Expected state:

Can declare for example $PORT1 and $PORT2 and those will properly be populated taking into account the amount of declared ports when running multiple processes of the same kind. Possibly it'd make sense to change the port number increment between processes from 100 to 100xnumber of ports

padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
padcom added a commit to padcom/foreman that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2012
@padcom padcom mentioned this issue Sep 26, 2012
@ddollar
Copy link
Owner

ddollar commented Apr 23, 2014

This is a level of complexity I'd rather not add to foreman

@ddollar ddollar closed this as completed Apr 23, 2014
@ClayShentrup
Copy link

How does process 2 know how to access process 1?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants