Should we make the new shape face numberings more lexical?

[drwells]

I noticed while writing #11121 that, for a pyramid, we implement face 0 as the base. I think it would be more logical to make this face 4 since it is in the same place as face 4 of the hexahedron. We could then renumber the other faces to also more closely match the hexahedral numbering scheme and do the same with wedge faces.

I'd like to do this before we get further along with mixed mesh support. What do y'all think?

[bangerth]

Can you try what happens? I don't know where that would break things, but it might be worth just trying it out.

[drwells]

Sure. We need to merge some of those PRs first.